SeriouslyIf men would stop using women as dumpsters for our lust, there would be no abortion.
By Guest Author
Mark Connolly
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Why Abortion is a Male Issue
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Fascinating Navigational Tidbits
If you click on a post's title, a page will open with that post and all the comments (if there are any) all nicely placed in readable font just below the post.
If you then click on The Glob Blog logo at the top, you will be taken back to the main blog with all the posts. You're welcome.
If you then click on The Glob Blog logo at the top, you will be taken back to the main blog with all the posts. You're welcome.
Contributors
Ponderances
"Stark staring incredulity is a far more loyal tribute to that truth than a modernist metaphysic that would make it out merely a matter of degree. It were better to rend our robes with a great cry against blasphemy, like Caiaphas in the judgement, or to lay hold of the man as a maniac possessed of devils like the kinsmen and the crowd, rather than to stand stupidly debating fine shades of pantheism in the presence of so catastrophic a claim. There is more of the wisdom that is one with surprise in any simple person, full of the sensitiveness of simplicity, who should expect the grass to wither and the birds to drop dead out of the air, when a strolling carpenter's apprentice said calmly and almost carelessly, like one looking over his shoulder: 'Before Abraham was, I am.'"
G. K. Chesterton
The Everlasting Man
Posts
Greener Pastures
Prior Udderances
-
►
2010
(1)
- ► 09/19/10 - 09/26/10 (1)
-
►
2009
(1)
- ► 03/29/09 - 04/05/09 (1)
-
▼
2008
(13)
- ► 05/04/08 - 05/11/08 (1)
- ► 03/30/08 - 04/06/08 (4)
- ► 03/23/08 - 03/30/08 (3)
- ► 03/16/08 - 03/23/08 (2)
- ► 03/09/08 - 03/16/08 (1)
-
►
2006
(1)
- ► 03/26/06 - 04/02/06 (1)
-
►
2005
(26)
- ► 10/09/05 - 10/16/05 (2)
- ► 10/02/05 - 10/09/05 (1)
- ► 09/11/05 - 09/18/05 (1)
- ► 08/14/05 - 08/21/05 (1)
- ► 07/31/05 - 08/07/05 (1)
- ► 04/17/05 - 04/24/05 (1)
- ► 04/10/05 - 04/17/05 (1)
- ► 04/03/05 - 04/10/05 (3)
- ► 03/27/05 - 04/03/05 (3)
- ► 03/20/05 - 03/27/05 (5)
- ► 03/13/05 - 03/20/05 (1)
- ► 03/06/05 - 03/13/05 (4)
- ► 01/16/05 - 01/23/05 (2)
-
►
2004
(124)
- ► 12/12/04 - 12/19/04 (1)
- ► 11/28/04 - 12/05/04 (1)
- ► 11/21/04 - 11/28/04 (1)
- ► 11/14/04 - 11/21/04 (2)
- ► 10/31/04 - 11/07/04 (6)
- ► 10/24/04 - 10/31/04 (4)
- ► 10/17/04 - 10/24/04 (4)
- ► 10/10/04 - 10/17/04 (6)
- ► 10/03/04 - 10/10/04 (9)
- ► 09/26/04 - 10/03/04 (6)
- ► 09/19/04 - 09/26/04 (5)
- ► 09/12/04 - 09/19/04 (6)
- ► 09/05/04 - 09/12/04 (7)
- ► 08/29/04 - 09/05/04 (3)
- ► 08/22/04 - 08/29/04 (9)
- ► 08/15/04 - 08/22/04 (4)
- ► 08/08/04 - 08/15/04 (1)
- ► 08/01/04 - 08/08/04 (8)
- ► 07/25/04 - 08/01/04 (13)
- ► 07/18/04 - 07/25/04 (13)
- ► 07/11/04 - 07/18/04 (15)
Fair Use
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social justice, and religious issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is made available for viewing and reading, etc., without profit to those who are visiting this website and who may have an interest in the included information for their own edification, research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social justice, and religious issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is made available for viewing and reading, etc., without profit to those who are visiting this website and who may have an interest in the included information for their own edification, research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Blog Stats
Exclaimer Disclaimer
The Glob Blog is the Official Blog of The Global Exclaimer. The purpose of The Glob Blog is to address whatever the editor of The Glob happens to be thinking about at the moment. It's secondary purpose is to provide an entertaining thought provoking read. The tone of this blog is pseudo-serious except where plain silly.
It may at times, and without warning, become very serious and dogmatic in a Loving Christian Way.
At times public figures and events will be discussed and quite probably made fun of and otherwise satirized. Aside from those cases, all other persons, places and things referenced in The Glob are fictional and any resemblance to real persons, whether living, dead, or unborn are coincidental and accidental. So there.
All original material is © Copyright 2008 The Global Exclaimer. All rights reserved. Additional earlier material is also © Copyright 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007. Not that anyone would plagiarize this crap.
It may at times, and without warning, become very serious and dogmatic in a Loving Christian Way.
At times public figures and events will be discussed and quite probably made fun of and otherwise satirized. Aside from those cases, all other persons, places and things referenced in The Glob are fictional and any resemblance to real persons, whether living, dead, or unborn are coincidental and accidental. So there.
All original material is © Copyright 2008 The Global Exclaimer. All rights reserved. Additional earlier material is also © Copyright 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007. Not that anyone would plagiarize this crap.
4 comments:
OK, I don’t disagree. And if your aim was to throw out a sound-bite in the name of dialogue you have succeeded, because I think there is a lot to talk about in this. I hereby take the bait!
Context: as opposed to “abortion is a female issue”? Redefining abortion is something other than a problem for the woman to deal with (or a right she alone possesses) sounds like a good start.
“If men would stop using women” says to me that women are victims, is this true as a general statement?
“Dumpsters for our lust” is likely true for us guys, but it occurs to me there are motivators on the female side of this equation as well, though they may be different motivators. This might loop me back to the “victim” part, I suppose.
Your statement alone will not eliminate abortion, the human capacity for self-justification runs wide and deep
I'm working on an erudite response.
erudite or r-o-dent?
Is there a difference?
Post a Comment